The Flawed Assumptions and Intentions of Florida’s Education Accountability System


It’s not certain where the most recent work of the Shanker Institute’s Matt DiCarlo will take the debate on Florida’ education accountability system. DiCarlo weighed in on Florida Senate president Don Gaetz comment (here and here) that Florida’s entire education accountability system was “in danger of imploding.” DiCarlo asserts that Gaetz’ assumptions that a correlation should exist between school grades and teacher evaluation is misguided:

…..in summary: Florida’s schools grades are heavily driven by students’ absolute performance levels, while its teacher evaluation ratings are designed to be independent of those levels. Again, both are matters of degree, and there are other reasons to expect to find some level of concentration of “lower-performing” teachers in schools with lower absolute performance scores (e.g., recruitment/retention issues).

That said, Florida’s school and teacher rating systems are, by design, measuring different things. If anything, an extremely strong relationship between the grades and evaluation ratings might be seen as a red flag that the latter are biased. At the very least, validating one by assuming it must match up with the other is, to put it gently, inappropriate.

Perhaps we can give Senator Gaetz a pass for not being intimately familiar with the properties of these systems’ measures. But there are certainly people in Florida with a better grasp of these issues, and let’s just hope their voices are being heard.

But DiCarlo is correct and has delivered some useful clarity. While Gaetz won’t be pleased with being dissed by an academic from Shanker, he’ll put DiCarlo’s conclusions to good use.

So why the concern over the perceived disconnect between school grades and teacher evaluations in the first place? For an answer, one must go back to the beginning when these two measures were born.

Jeb Bush’s education legacy was fueled by the “failing schools” narrative that arose after A Nation at Risk was published during Ronald Reagan’s presidency in 1983.  A Nation at Risk’s  conclusions were based on test data. If only “failing schools could be identified and closed in favor or another choice, say, charter schools. But a funny thing happened along the way after Bush implemented his A-Plus plan. Not that many Florida schools failed , save Bush’s precious charter schools –  15 or 31 F schools in 2011 were charter schools. And virtually all of those were located in impoverished areas or where English was a second language in the home. Oops. Poverty and demographics mattered after all.

So maybe its the teachers. If only “bad teachers” could be identified and fired. After Charlie Crist’s pen vetoed SB 6 in March of 2010, Rick Scott signed SB736 into law which mandated  50 percent of a teachers evaluations comes from test results – the same as what helps determines school grades. But a funny thing happened after Scott implemented his ironically named Student Success Act. The initial roll-out of data found that better than 96 percent of Florida teachers were rated “effective” of “highly effective.” Uh-oh. Maybe Florida’s teachers are pretty good after all.

Gaetz cannot be blamed for recognizing the disconnect between school grades and teacher evaluation data. But he was around when Florida policymakers’  obsession with test data began. It was assumed that test data was  finally identifying “failing schools” and “bad teachers” and that we finally had a way to get rid of both.

But a funny thing happened on the road to education reform’s Canaan, the Florida model. The tests didn’t get the results they wanted. The intention was to close public schools and fire bad teachers  and it was assumed that their legislation – and their tests – could do just that.  No one should be surprised of recent revelations that Florida’s education accountability system doesn’t make any sense.

 

About these ads

About Bob Sikes

A long time ago and a planet far, far away I was an athletic trainer for the New York Mets. I was blessed to be part of the now legendary 1986 World Series Championship. My late father told me that I'd one day be thankful I had that degree in teaching from Florida State University. He was right and I became twice blesses to become a teacher in the late 1990's. After dabbling with writing about the Mets and then politics, I settled on education.
This entry was posted in EDUCATION, FLORIDA POLITICS and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Flawed Assumptions and Intentions of Florida’s Education Accountability System

  1. Pingback: Florida’s Nutty Accountability System « Diane Ravitch's blog

  2. kafkateach says:

    The entire Florida accountability system is one big scam where one data report conflicts with another data report and then the data wizards at the FLDOE will fix the cut scores to make the data resemble whatever they want it to. As a teacher in Dade County who still has not received a value added score for a test that was taken last April, nor a completed evaluation for 2011-12 because the entire result is basically determined by a VAM ranking, I can personally attest to the scam. I sent ten emails to different district and state almighty data controllers about how I could access my personal value added ranking, and not one person would respond in an email. I filed a request for public records and am waiting to see if they release any details. I am supposed to be “data driven” but I don’t even have the right to see the data that will ultimately determine my evaluation and whether I get to keep my job or am eligible for a raise. You can see the actual FLDOE reports on my blog and draw your own conclusions about the bogosity. It’s obvious. Even a fifth grader can see it. http://kafkateach.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/is-the-florida-department-of-education-smarter-than-a-fifth-grader

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s