Going Beyond the SOS March by Recognizing the Politics Involved in the Way Forward

A teaching colleague from Washington mentioned in one of the FB pages I help administrate – Save Our Schools Florida – that she admired the activity on our page. When she told us about what they were beginning to do in her state, it made me realize that to transition from the energy of the SOS March it will be necessary to accept and recognize political realities. Battles will have to be fought on both  national and state fronts. These most immediately will  be found in the 2012 presidential race and in state legislatures currently in session.

Collaboration between states can be critical. We don’t seem to be doing this right now, but the school reform movement  is sure doing so. Its rock stars like Michelle Rhee and Jeb Bush routinely make presentations to state legislatures. Billionaire funded groups like ALEC and Stand for Children hop from state-to-state to both write and affect school legislation.  Simply by being aware of what’s happening and providing – if you will – actionable intelligence to colleagues in other states will make a huge difference.

State legislator’s privatization schemes use provisions from both NCLB and RTTT to justify their efforts. Defeating the two is closer to a reality with Arne Duncan’s takeover of education policy this week.  Neither piece of legislation is popular anymore, and the unpopularity is bipartisan. Without the ammunition of federal guidelines, even the most powerful privatization ideologue in some state legislature isn’t so big and bad. They will be forced to deal directly with stakeholders and answer to voters for their policies. Ultimately the students and families are better served because the decision-making occurs closer to them.

As its clear this opposition to NCLB and RTTT is bipartisan, we will need to both look for and accept allies from wherever we can find them. Duncan’s move this week to grant state waivers from NCLB as he alone sees fit has prompted the attention of voters who were once casual observers of public education policy.

There’s reason to be confident that bith NCLB and RTTT will enter 2012’s presidential politics  – and be driven from the republican side. Two of the GOP’ leading candidates in Rick Perry and Michelle Bachmann ardently opposed NCLB long before Duncan’s power grab. Perry furthermore declined – and quite publicly – not to allow his state, Texas, to apply for  RTTT money. His state furthermore dropped out of joining the common core standards bandwagon. The two other frontrunners in the race, former governors Tim Pawlenty and Mitt Romney, are standardized-test based, market reformers. These clear distinctions give us the opportunity to make all the GOP hopefuls talk and debate education policy during the run-up to individual state primaries.

Ours by definition, is a grassroots movement; one which draws followers from all over. We share a similar reality in our understanding of both the facts on the ground and what we are trying to preserve.  Our  point of view can be easily distinguished from the mantras and slogans of the school reform juggernaut. The critical, dynamic connection between teaching, learning and schools  is at risk.  It is this that has become imperiled by the money, marketing schemes and misguided assumptions of a few.

About Bob Sikes

A long time ago and a planet far, far away I was an athletic trainer for the New York Mets. I was blessed to be part of the now legendary 1986 World Series Championship. My late father told me that I'd one day be thankful I had that degree in teaching from Florida State University. He was right and I became twice blesses to become a teacher in the late 1990's. After dabbling with writing about the Mets and then politics, I settled on education.
This entry was posted in EDUCATION and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Going Beyond the SOS March by Recognizing the Politics Involved in the Way Forward

  1. I admire your optimism. National and state level legislators and policymakers are by and large on the same side. Here in Florida, Jeb is driving policy and it would be political suicide to disagree with him. There is massive public concern and opposition to federal initiatives for a variety of reasons, but the opposition is the common unity. I agree on looking for allies is critical. The powers propelling these initiatives are strong. At a minimum, bloggers and blog followers are getting the facts and opportunities to question. I remain a staunch supporter of parent initiatives. I am a NUT.

    Haven’t found any taxpayer groups questioning the sustainability of these initiatives and where the $ will come from. Property taxes anyone?

    • Bob Sikes says:

      I welcome any and all parent initiatives and invovment in ANY form unless its not above board. The political class knows and manipulates “parent trigger laws” to impose charter schools of neigborhoods that dont want them.

      And yes,Grumpy,I am positive. Along with the mischief that corporate school refrmers have been up to, the failure of NCLB and skepticism of RTTT is in the public eye. Because of this, corporate school reformers have to defend their agenda in the arena of ideas.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s