Anti-Teacher Union Rhetoric Is Not Supported by Test Data


No education reform rock start can get through a few sentences without playing the “union” card. Walt Gardner makes mince meat of the argument by pointing to those NAEP results they quote so much:

……if teachers unions are responsible for low student achievement, then students in states where teachers unions are weak should do much better than students in states where teachers unions are strong. This is not the case. In Massachusetts and Minnesota, where teachers are heavily unionized, students post the highest scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, the nation’s report card. Conversely, in Mississippi, Louisiana and Arkansas, which have few teachers union members and virtually no union contracts, students have the lowest NAEP scores (“Beyond Silver Bullets for American Education,” The Nation, Dec. 22, 2010).

We’ve been finding out that using test data to justify a policy position in education is quite the slippery slope, but it is eduction reformers who have made them matter so much. Its fair to wonder what likely GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney – a former governor of one of those states might say about this. Education reform rhetoric has become narrowly thematic. Gardner sites liberal journalist Juan Williams as an example:

He claims that teachers unions are “formidable opponents willing to fight even modest efforts to alter the status quo.” Their obstructionism is responsible for the one million high school dropouts each year and for a graduation rate of less than 50 percent for black and Hispanic students. Williams says that when schools are free of unions, they succeed because they can fire ineffective teachers, implement merit pay, lengthen the school day, enrich the curriculum and deal with classroom discipline.

Perhaps Williams wasn’t aware of the Minnesota and Massachusetts examples. Or even  a state like Florida which  has one of those loathsome teacher unions, too. Williams education policy naiveté is demonstrated when he found a way to say unions are somehow an impediment to classroom discipline or responsible for the narrowing of curriculum.

But no matter. Ed reformers have acquired another mind-numbed,  liberal mascot in Williams  as he, too, has been intoxicated by their predictable talking points.  For them, “status quo,” “union obstructionism” and “merit pay”  are among the go-to,  Semper fidelis  rhetorical flourishes to invoke when anyone questions the wisdom or motives of their policies.

About Bob Sikes

A long time ago and a planet far, far away I was an athletic trainer for the New York Mets. I was blessed to be part of the now legendary 1986 World Series Championship. My late father told me that I'd one day be thankful I had that degree in teaching from Florida State University. He was right and I became twice blesses to become a teacher in the late 1990's. After dabbling with writing about the Mets and then politics, I settled on education.
This entry was posted in EDUCATION and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Anti-Teacher Union Rhetoric Is Not Supported by Test Data

  1. Pingback: Anti-Teacher Union Rhetoric Is Not Supported by Test Data | FPEP Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s