What Does Hesitancy to Change on HS Graduation Requirments Say About Bush Foundations?


Patricia Levesque was against bipartisan support for changing Florida’s high school graduation requirements before she was for it. Writes Mary McGrory in the Tampa Bay Times:

Earlier this month, Patricia Levesque, executive director of the Foundation for Florida’s Future, tried to dissuade a House panel from dropping geometry from the graduation requirements. She urged lawmakers not to lower the standards, saying Florida students had a track record of rising to the occasion.

Levesque also raised concerns with the diploma designations. “When you set those low bars, the students that are going to be more often counseled into that diploma are our minority and underrepresented students,” she said.

According to StateImpact’sJohn O’Connor, Levesque has couched her opposition and is supporting a senate bill which has “similar goals” that’s intended to offer alternative paths to graduation.

This might be an exercise in horse trading, but Levesque’s predictable rhetoric about “rigor” and “raising the bar” didn’t influence legislators. Sen. Bill Montford seemed to push back with ‘this whole approach is not … retreating, not backing down. It’s a tweaking and a better alternative for a lot of our students.”

But Levesque’s insistence that Florida keep it’s geometry requirement shows her and the foundations she speaks for to be out of touch. Educators have long felt that the Geometry requirement was a rigorous standard too far. One only needs to take a look at the high failure rate on state Algebra tests to understand. A far better and more valuable alternative such as Accounting would give students real life skills and an entrepreneurial base. It is due to Florida’s test-dominated reforms – of which Levesque is a primary architect – that schools like mine discontinued their Accounting programs.

Does Levesque’s position furthermore reveal how conflicted both Bush foundations have become?  To eliminate a mandated test is to cut into the profit margin of the corporations who fund them. Alternative paths to graduation weaken test corporations grip on policy via their successful nationalization of Common Core Standards. Its not as easy to force vo-tech alternatives into the tidy cartel they are attempted to solidify.

And weren’t Bush’s foundations all about choices?

About Bob Sikes

A long time ago and a planet far, far away I was an athletic trainer for the New York Mets. I was blessed to be part of the now legendary 1986 World Series Championship. My late father told me that I'd one day be thankful I had that degree in teaching from Florida State University. He was right and I became twice blesses to become a teacher in the late 1990's. After dabbling with writing about the Mets and then politics, I settled on education.
This entry was posted in EDUCATION, FLORIDA POLITICS and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to What Does Hesitancy to Change on HS Graduation Requirments Say About Bush Foundations?

  1. When I graduated all those years ago, I didn’t take any math as a senior and general math II was as high as I went, several college degrees latter the class I really wish I would have taken was typing…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s